Arc Forumnew | comments | leaders | submitlogin
2 points by akkartik 2472 days ago | link | parent

"I fear it won't put enough pressure on certain experiments to see what their real strengths are. It kinda banks on the idea that people other than me will use it and apply their own pressure to their own experiments."

Even better if you could get others to put pressure on your experiments.



1 point by rocketnia 2472 days ago | link

"Even better if you could get others to put pressure on your experiments."

Well, that's both sides of the issue I'm talking about. I do want people to put pressure on each other's experiments, but I expect to promote that by reducing the difficulty involved in migrating from one experiment to another. Unfortunately, I expect that'll also make it easier for people not to put any more than a certain amount of pressure on any one experiment.

Or are you talking about my experiments in particular? :)

-----

1 point by akkartik 2472 days ago | link

No, you understood me right. If you make it too easy to fragment the language the eyeballs on any subsurface get stretched mighty thin.

This might actually be one reason lisp has fragmented: it's too easy to implement and fork, and so it has forked again and again since the day it was implemented. Suddenly ruby's brittle, hacky, error-prone parser becomes an asset rather than a liability. It's too hard to change (all those cases where you can drop parens or curlies at the end of a function call), and it keeps the language from forking.

-----

2 points by evanrmurphy 2472 days ago | link

Upvoted for the new quoting style. I think double quotes + italics is a winner for news.arc forums. (I usually do a right angle bracket + italics, but I like the way yours looks better.)

-----